The National Council of Chain Restaurants applauded Saturday's veto of California Senate Bill 120 by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. The bill would have forced chain restaurants with at least 14 locations to post calories beside each regular food item on their menu boards. It also would have required those restaurants to provide information about calories, saturated fat and trans fat, carbohydrates and levels of sodium on hand-out menus.
Schwarzenegger's veto follows a decision last month by a federal court judge striking down a labeling mandate in New York City for exceeding the city's authority.
In a letter to members of the California State Senate, Schwarzenegger called the bill "impractical," saying he refused to sign it due to concern that the bill would "place burdens and costs upon some restaurant owners while imposing no burdens or costs on others." Schwarzenegger acknowledged in his letter to the senate that many chain restaurants already provide nutritional information to their customers in a variety of ways, through posters, tray liners, and the Internet.
"NCCR applauds Governor Schwarzenegger for recognizing that this ill-advised mandate would have punished the very restaurants that have been providing information to customers while not requiring others to provide any information at all," said Jack Whipple, President of the National Council of Chain Restaurants, in a prepared statement. "This veto should give policymakers considering similar proposals in other jurisdictions significant pause, especially given the fact that chain restaurants have voluntarily provided comprehensive nutritional information to their customers for years."
Editor's Insight: Schwarzenegger's ruling is favorable to the foodservice industry, but the industry should not be lulled into complacency by this ruling and that of a judge who ruled against a New York City menu labeling law.
VendingMarketWatch has taken the position that the food industry should seek a federal law that includes nationwide standards. This will be the easier and more cost effective for manufacturers to comply with.
The food industry should not attempt to oppose better food labeling requirements, given the consumers' well documented call for more complete information at the point of sale. 10-16-07 by Elliot Maras
