News Archives| Readers Respond | Submit News | Subscribe to Daily Update | Industry Reports | VMW Blog | Events | For Route Drivers

VendingMarketWatch.com |

Online Article Page

  

VendingMarketWatch News


General Mills Breakfast Campaign For Kids Creates Controversy


A controversial national ad campaign from General Mills looks likely to run into trouble with the health lobby, according to Food-NavigatorUSA.com.

The campaign will tell kids that breakfasts can help them stay focused in the morning and build muscles, and new ads will tout the beneficial effects of cereal.

The commercials will air on Nickelodeon and the Cartoon Network.

But critics are worried that because the pitch includes sugary cereals such as Cocoa Puffs, Trix and Cinnamon Toast Crunch, children will mix up the benefits and healthy cereals with others that are not so nutritious.

Kristen Harrison, professor of speech communication at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, for example, told FoodNavigator-USA recently that the problem with TV advertising is that it intentionally blurs distinctions of what is nutritious.

General Mills however is unrepentant.

"This is exactly what a leader in the food industry should be doing," said Elizabeth Lascoutx, vice president and director of the Children's Advertising Review Unit.

The company, which reported annual worldwide net sales of $12.3 billion last year, also argues that numerous studies demonstrate the importance of breakfast to school performance, thus validating the campaign.

"Those who would criticize the sugar in presweetened cereals need to look at the science," said Susan Crockett, Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition. "Cereal, both presweetened and non-sweetened, makes up less than 5 percent of a child's daily sugar intake. But in return, a bowl of cereal with milk provides a wide variety of important nutrients including calcium, iron, folic acid and B vitamins all for about 120 calories per serving."

The debate over General Mills’ new advertising campaign underlines the growing divergence in opinion over the responsibilities of food advertising and its influence on children. Where once a health claim was viewed as a commonplace marketing device, it is now scrutinized with the intensity once commonly reserved for issues of food safety.





Reader Comments
Sort by Post: Most RecentFirst Comment

Posted by Josh Lev
It takes a strong dose of cynicism to accept the argument that nearly 1 can of Cokes worth of sugar equals just 5% of a childs daily intake is a small price to pay for them to drink some milk. However, if anyones doing the research, they are. If I were them Id assert that exact argument. Bet their kids dont eat packaged foods, though. I would argue to keep those brands and products out of the schools -- the only way to combat marketing is through education, obviously -- mcfood in schools really does blur those lines in a way that is too confusing for parents to fairly educate toward.
(03/21/07 - 01:01 PM)


Posted by david lamb
Re: General Mills Breakfast Campaign For Kids Creates Controversy
Itis not healthy if it contains hydrogenated oils
(06/07/05 - 12:00 AM)



Submit a Comment

 
Name: *
Subject:
City, State:
Email: *
 
 
   
 
For verification purposes, please enter the characters you see in the image below
 
 
   
 
   
* = required
(comments will appear after this article, as well as on our Readers Respond Page)